Regulatory Standards Bill: Critics Warn of “Dangerous” Legislation
Critics are sounding the alarm over the proposed Regulatory Standards Bill, calling it “dangerous” and raising concerns about its potential impact on New Zealand’s constitutional framework. The bill, which is currently open for consultation, aims to increase transparency in lawmaking but has sparked controversy due to its perceived alignment with ACT party ideology.
Opponents of the bill, including Emeritus Professor Jane Kelsey, argue that it prioritizes private property rights at the expense of other considerations such as social issues, the environment, and Te Tiriti o Waitangi. They warn that the bill could lead to a shift towards right-wing libertarian ideology and undermine the interests of marginalized communities.
Proponents of the bill, led by Regulation Minister David Seymour, defend it as a necessary step towards better regulation and more transparent governance. They emphasize the importance of individual and property rights in empowering New Zealanders to improve their lives and create opportunities for themselves and others.
The bill’s consultation period, which coincided with the summer holidays and submissions for the Treaty Principles Bill, has also come under scrutiny for potentially limiting public awareness and feedback. Critics like Melanie Wilson argue that the timing of the consultation reflects a lack of commitment from the government to engage with the public on such a significant legislative proposal.
As the debate over the Regulatory Standards Bill continues, stakeholders on both sides are grappling with questions of balance, accountability, and the role of government in shaping New Zealand’s regulatory landscape. With submissions set to close soon, the future of the bill remains uncertain, but its implications for the country’s governance and values are already sparking intense debate.
