Disagreement Over Ending ShotSpotter Technology in Chicago: Mayor and Aldermen at Odds

The debate over the use of ShotSpotter technology in Chicago has reached a boiling point, with Mayor Brandon Johnson and some Chicago aldermen at odds over who has the authority to end its use.

On Wednesday, the City Council approved an order giving themselves control over the technology and allowing more time to collect data on its effectiveness. However, Mayor Johnson insists that the measure is not legal and plans to get rid of ShotSpotter in the fall.

Chicago police have been using ShotSpotter for several years, but controversy arose when studies questioned its effectiveness. Despite the mayor’s claims that he has canceled the technology, contracts for ShotSpotter do not expire, and Johnson has only extended the contract until the fall.

In response to the mayor’s actions, 34 City Council members voted for a measure that would require the police department to collect more data on ShotSpotter and allow the Council to decide whether to keep it or not.

While Mayor Johnson argues that the measure is not legal, the order’s sponsor, 17th Ward Alderman David Moore, maintains that it is within the Council’s authority to make decisions on contracts and budgets.

The debate highlights the power struggle between the executive and legislative branches of Chicago’s government, with legal experts weighing in on the issue. The mayor’s office has yet to provide an explanation for why they believe the measure is not legal.

As the situation unfolds, Mayor Johnson has the option to veto the measure, but it would require 34 votes to override his decision. The future of ShotSpotter in Chicago remains uncertain as the Council continues to gather data and debate its fate.